CR No. CR No. CR No. CR No.4489 of 2026 4489 of 2026 4489 of 2026 4489 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 204-U TEK CHAND TEK CHAND TEK CHAND TEK CHAND Vs Vs Vs Vs STATE OF STATE OF STATE OF STATE OF PUNJAB PUNJAB PUNJAB PUNJAB CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Present: Mr. for the Mr. Puru Jarewal, D.A.G., Punjab. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) [1]. By way of present order dated 04.07 (hereinafter to be referred as the seeking reference preferred at the instance of the petitioner/landowner structures were rejected. [2]. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is covered by the decision dated 21.05.2026 passed by this Court in CR No.3033 of 2026 CR No.3033 of 2026 CR No.3033 of 2026 CR No.3033 of 2026 [3]. In such circumst of in terms of the order passed in the remanded back to the learned Reference Court. The learned Reference Court is requested to formulate issues with respect to the filing of objections by the landowner or the same being barred by limitation other material fact in issue 4489 of 2026 4489 of 2026 4489 of 2026 4489 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH CR No. CR No. CR No. CR No.4489 4489 4489 4489 Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: PUNJAB PUNJAB PUNJAB PUNJAB AND ORS. AND ORS. AND ORS. AND ORS. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. R.S. Manhas, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Puru Jarewal, D.A.G., Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) By way of present revision petition 04.07.2017 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, (hereinafter to be referred as the ‘Reference Court’ ‘Reference Court’ ‘Reference Court’ ‘Reference Court’ seeking reference preferred at the instance of the petitioner/landowner were rejected. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is covered by the decision dated 21.05.2026 passed by this Court in CR No.3033 of 2026 CR No.3033 of 2026 CR No.3033 of 2026 CR No.3033 of 2026 titled ‘Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others’ Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others’ Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others’ Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others’ In such circumstances, the present revision petition is also disposed of in terms of the order passed in the Joginder Singh’s Joginder Singh’s Joginder Singh’s Joginder Singh’s remanded back to the learned Reference Court. The learned Reference Court is to formulate issues with respect to the filing of objections by the landowner or the same being barred by limitation other material fact in issue. The petitioner be afforded opportunity to lead evidence IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH 4489 4489 4489 4489 of 2026 of 2026 of 2026 of 2026 (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: 22226666....00005555.202 .202 .202 .2026666 ...... ...... ...... ......Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner .........Respondent .Respondent .Respondent .Respondent((((ssss)))) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ MANUJ MANUJ MANUJAAAA petition(s), challenge has been laid to the passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Pathankot ‘Reference Court’ ‘Reference Court’ ‘Reference Court’ ‘Reference Court’), whereby the application seeking reference preferred at the instance of the petitioner/landowner qua At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is covered by the decision dated 21.05.2026 passed by this Court in Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others’ Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others’ Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others’ Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others’. the present revision petition is also disposed Joginder Singh’s Joginder Singh’s Joginder Singh’s Joginder Singh’s case. The matter is remanded back to the learned Reference Court. The learned Reference Court is to formulate issues with respect to the alleged forgery, if any, regarding filing of objections by the landowner or the same being barred by limitation or any be afforded opportunity to lead evidence 1 , challenge has been laid to the Pathankot , whereby the application qua At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is covered by the decision dated 21.05.2026 passed by this Court in the present revision petition is also disposed The matter is remanded back to the learned Reference Court. The learned Reference Court is regarding or any be afforded opportunity to lead evidence MOHMED ATIK 2026.05.26 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CR No. CR No. CR No. CR No.4489 of 2026 4489 of 2026 4489 of 2026 4489 of 2026 on the said issues and the adjudication be thus, made afresh by the learned Reference Court. Court on 29.05.2026 29.05.2026 29.05.2026 29.05.2026 Reference Court with respec inquiry/investigation by the SSP Pathankot are also set aside. [4]. All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. May May May May 22226666,,,,20 20 20 2026 26 26 26 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 4489 of 2026 4489 of 2026 4489 of 2026 4489 of 2026 d issues and the adjudication be thus, made afresh by the learned Reference Court. The parties are directed to appear before the learned Reference 29.05.2026 29.05.2026 29.05.2026 29.05.2026 for further proceedings. The directions issued by the learned Reference Court with respect to the registration of FIR or even about the inquiry/investigation by the SSP Pathankot are also set aside. All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No d issues and the adjudication be thus, made afresh by the learned The parties are directed to appear before the learned Reference The directions issued by the learned t to the registration of FIR or even about the inquiry/investigation by the SSP Pathankot are also set aside. All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2 d issues and the adjudication be thus, made afresh by the learned The parties are directed to appear before the learned Reference The directions issued by the learned t to the registration of FIR or even about the MOHMED ATIK 2026.05.26 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment