Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23370 (CHH)

SMT. ANJITA SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/6290/2024 · 2026-06-24

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26109 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6290 of 2024 1 - Smt. Anjita Sahu W/o Gopesh Sahu, Aged About 40 Years Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Patora, Block-Patan, District-Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.). 2 - The Collector, District-Durg (C.G.). 3 - The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Durg, District-Durg (C.G.). 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (R), Sub Division-Patan, District-Durg (C.G.). 5 - The Chief Executiver Officer, Janpad Panchayat-Patan, District-Durg (C.G.). 6 - The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat-Patora, Block- Patan, District-Durg (C.G.). 7 - Shri Ghanshyam Sahu, Up-Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat-Patora, S/o Shri Bodhari Ram Sahu, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat- Patora, Block-Patan, District-Durg (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Devendra Kumar Swarnakar, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Jitendra Kumar Advocate. For State/ Respondent(s) : Mr. Anant Bajpaiye, P.L. ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Digitally signed by ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Date: 2026.06.27 13:24:01 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 25.06.2026 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arpan