Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:25953
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 440 of 2024 1 - Netram Agrawal S/o Late Manohar Lal Aged About 76 Years R/o 49 Nehru Nagar Bhiali-Durg C.G., Taluka, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 1) 2 - Sandeep Agrawal S/o Netram Agrawal Aged About 42 Years R/o 49 Nehru Nagar Bhiali-Durg C.G., Taluka, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 2) 3 - Reeta Agrawal W/o Dinesh Agrawal Aged About 45 Years R/o Near Chandragrih Udyog Railway Station Chindwada, District- Chindwada, M.P. (Defendant No. 3) 4 - Reena Agrawal W/o Vijay Agrawal Aged About 43 Years R/o Durga College Road, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, C.G. (Defendent No. 4) 5 - Ashish Agrawal S/o Late Arjun Ram Agrawal Aged About 40 Years R/o Khursipar Bhilai- Durg, C.G., District Durg, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 5) 6 - Misa Finvest Pvt. Ltd. C/o Director Sandeep Agrawal, Office At 49 Nehru Nagar Bhilai- Durg C.G., District Durg, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 6) 7 - M/s Vedika Minerals C/o Director Netram Agrawal, Office At 49 Nehru Nagar, Bhilai-Durg C.G. District Durg, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 7)
... Petitioner(s) versus SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2026.06.27 11:55:59 +0530
2 1 - Sanjay Agrawal S/o Netram Agrawal Aged About 50 Years Presently Residing At, Aishwarya Residency, Old Telibandha, Near Currency Tower, G E Road, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Plaintiff) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Collector Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh
(Defendant
No.
8) 3 - Municipal Corporation Bhilai Through Commissioner, Nagar Palika Nigam Supela Bhilai District- Durg, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 9)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Singhal, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Vinod Kumar Tekam, GA For Respondent No.3 : Mr. H.B.Agrawal, Sr.Counsel assisted by Ms. Preeti Yadav, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Order on Board 24/06/2026 It has been informed by the counsel for the parties that the Civil Suit has already been decided by the learned trial court on 02.08.2025 and the present writ petition has now become infructuous. ON the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. However, liberty is granted in favour of the petitioner to revive their prayer, if cause of action still survives. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge