Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23366 (KAR)

MRS PRIYANKA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/2567/2019 · 2026-06-17

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29631 CRL.P No. 2567 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2567 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. MRS. PRIYANKA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, W/O HARSHA SAAVEKAR 2. MR. HARSHA SAAVEKAR AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, S/O RAGHUNATH RAO, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT 002, NAKSHATRA, 4TH CROSS, TAYAPPA GARDENS, BILEKAHALLI, (LAND MARK NEAR MUNESHWARA TEMPLE) BANGALORE - 560 076. ALSO AT NO.3, 4H CROSS NEAR ANDRA BANK, ANANTHA NAGAR, HUSKUR GATE ELECTRONIC CITY, BANGALORE - 74. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. PRIYANKA - PARTY IN PERSON (ABSENT); SRI. HARSHA SAAVEKAR, PARTY IN PERSON (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE POLICE OF WOMEN POLICE STATION-I, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29631 CRL.P No. 2567 of 2019 BASAVANAGUDI, WEST RANGE, BANGALORE - 560 070 REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. SHWETHA C.M. W/O PUNEETSAVEKAR, AGED 28 YEARS, R/A 1403/6, 22ND CROSS, I & II EAST JAYANAGAR, NEAR SWIMMING POOL BANGALORE - 560 011. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SOUMYA R, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. G. DEVARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THEM IN C.C.NO.12393/2018 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S.498-A R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AND SEC.3 AND 4 OF DP ACT NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE II ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29631 CRL.P No. 2567 of 2019 ORAL ORDER Despite counsel for petitioners having retired from matter by serving notice of retirement on 31.03.2023, petitioners have not made any alternative arrangement nor appeared before this Court. This would indicate that petitioners are not diligent to pursue matter. Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1