Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:40034
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWPOA No.6009 of 2020 a/w
CWPOA No.6024 of 2020
Decided on: 17th September, 2026
1.
CWPOA No.6009 of 2020
Vineet Kumar
....Petitioner
versus
State of H.P. and others
...Respondents
2.
CWPOA No.6024 of 2020
Gopal Singh
....Petitioner
versus
State of H.P. and others
...Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner(s): Mr. Onkar Jairath, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anshul Jairath, Mr. Piyush Mehta & Ms. Neha Thakur, Advocates, in both the petitions.
For the respondents-State: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Hemant Kumar Verma, Deputy Advocate General, in both the petitions.
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned senior counsel representing the petitioner(s) in both the petitions, submits that the issue raised in the present
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2026:HHC:40034 2
petitions is squarely covered by the judgment dated 31.08.2026 passed by this Court in CWPOA No.6029 of 2020, titled, Shyam Lal vs. State of H.P. and others.
2.
Learned Deputy Advocate General does not dispute this fact.
3.
Keeping in view the above fact, the present petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents that the decision rendered in Shyam Lal’s case (supra) shall be mutatis mutandis applied in the cases of the present petitioners and they shall also be extended the same relief as extended in Shyam Lal's case (supra). The needful shall be done within three months from today. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 17th September, 2026
Judge (naveen)