GIAN CHAND SHARMA v. DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER MANDI AND OTHERS
RP/100/2026 · 2026-09-18
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Review Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23364 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23364 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Review Petition No.100 of 2026
Decided on: 18th September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gian Chand Sharma
…..Petitioner
Versus
Divisional Commissioner, Mandi & Ors. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Deven Krishan Khanna and
Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocates.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. Hitansh Raj, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Heard. Petitioner is essentially endeavoring to raise issues, which are within the domain of demarcating authority/other competent forums and is also espousing apprehended cause of demarcating authority. No ground for review is made out. Accordingly, the review petition is
1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes
2
dismissed alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 18, 2026
Judge Mukesh