Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23362 (CHH)

MOHIT RANSURE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4706/2026 · 2026-06-24

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26016 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4706 of 2026 Mohit Ransure S/o Manoj Ransure, Aged About 40 Years R/o Station Para, Ward No. 11, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Municipal Corporation, Through Commissioner, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Kumar Yadav, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Ms. Diksha Gouraha, Dy. Govt. Advocate For Respondents No.2 & 3 : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 25/06/2026 SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2026.06.27 12:22:14 +0530 2 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide his application for grant of compassionate appointment on account of the death of his father. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's father died in harness on 02.12.2019. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted an application dated 25.01.2020 (Annexure P-2) seeking compassionate appointment. He submits that despite lapse of considerable time, the said application has neither been considered nor decided by the competent authority and no order has been passed thereon till date. 3. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 & 3/Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon submits that if the application submitted by the petitioner is still pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law within the stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings as well as the documents appended with the writ petition. 5. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and also taking into account the submission made by learned counsel for the respondent Corporation, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.2 & 3/Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon to consider and decide the pending 3 application/representation submitted by the petitioner for compassionate appointment and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of five weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE $. Bhilwar