Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23362 (AP)

RAMAKRISHNA MURTHY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/21621/2025 · 2026-02-23

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010419842025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 21621/2025 Between: 1. RAMAKRISHNA MURTHY, S/O. RAME GOWDU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC-AGRICULTURE, RESIDING AT NADAMANTHRAM VILLAGE, MUDARAMDODDI POST, V.KOTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAMANER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, V.KOTA, MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, NADAMANTHRAM VILLAGE, V.KOTA, MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. T V CHOWDAPPA, S/O. LATE T.VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS OCC- AGRICULTURE, RESIDING AT NADAMANTHRAM VILLAGE, MUDARAMDODDI POST, V.KOTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents No. 4 to 6 in interfering with petitioner rights over the land in an extant of Ac. 0.79 Cents in Sy.No. 507/5, and Ac. 0.57 Cents in Sy.No. 507/6,of Mudaramdoddi village, V.Kota Mandal, Chittoor District without adhering due process of law and that too without issuing any notice, as arbitrary, illegal and colorable exercise of power apart from being violative of fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed to petitioner under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.2 to 6 not to interfere with petitioner rights over the land in extant of Ac. 0.79 Cents in Sy.No. 507/5, and Ac. 0.57 Cents in Sy.No. 507/6, of Mudaramdoddi village, V.Kota Mandal, Chittoor District without following due process of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents No. 4 to 6 not to interfere with petitioner rights over of the land in an extant of an Ac. 0.79 Cents in Sy.No. 507/5, and Ac. 0.79 Cents in Sy.No. 507/5, and Ac. 0.57 Cents in Sy.No. 507/6, of Mudaramdoddi village, V.Kota Mandal, Chittoor District without following due process of law pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B.V.DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 5. In spite of service of notice, none appears for the 6th respondent. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.4 to 6 in interfering with the rights of the petitioner over the land in an extent of Ac.0.79 cents in Sy.No.507/5 and Ac.0.57 cents in Sy.No.507/6 of Mudaramdoddi village, V.Kota Mandal, Chittoor District without adhering due process of law and that too without issuing any notice. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent submits that the subject lands are standing in the name of the petitioner and he has been issued pattadar passbook and title deed vide ROR 1B Khata No.640. The 5th respondent has not taken any action to mutate any other name without any documentary evidence. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances and recording the said written instructions of the 4th respondent, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The written instructions of the 4th respondent shall be made as part of the court 4 record. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 24.02.2026 NNN