Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23360 (ORI)

MUSTAKIM KHAN v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/7241/2026 · 2026-06-30

R K Pattanaik

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.7216 of 2026 Muktar Khan and another …. Petitioners Mr. B. Dalai, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panda, ASC ABLAPL No.7241 of 2026 Mustakim Khan …. Petitioner Mr. R.S. Samal, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panda, ASC ABLAPL No.7255 of 2026 Sk. Basa Babu@Sk. Badsa Babu@ Basa Khan …. Petitioner Mr. S.R. Mulia, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panda, ASC And ABLAPL No.7264 of 2026 Sarajuddin Khan@Sirajuddin …. Petitioner Mr. S.R. Mulia, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panda, ASC p. 2 CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK Order No. ORDER 30.06.2026 01. 1. All the ABLAPLs are taken up for a common order 2. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 3. Instant petitions under Section 482 BNSS are filed for pre-arrest bail of the petitioners in connection with Nischintakoili P.S. Case No.216 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No.355 of 2026 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C., Nischintakoili on the grounds stated therein. 4. Perused the FIR. It is alleged therein that cows were found grazing randomly in a locality without proper shelter to have been provided to them. The other allegations are revealed from the FIR. The names of the petitioners are mentioned in the FIR with the allegation that they are responsible for the negligence. It is also alleged in the FIR that no one came forward claiming such possession to receive the cattle. Considering the nature of allegations in the FIR, though the petitioners have been entangled and are having antecedents, with the objection of the State noted down, this Court directs them to surrender before the learned court below for being released with stringent conditions even though their bail plea is not entertained. 5. Accordingly, it is ordered. 6. In the result, ABLAPLs are disposed of. It is further directed that in the event the petitioners surrender within a p. 3 fortnight from today before the learned J.M.F.C., Nischintakoili in connection with Nischintakoili P.S. Case No.216 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No.355 of 2026, they shall be released on bail subject to them furnishing bail bonds of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees forty thousand) each with one solvent surety for the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below, which shall be at liberty to impose such other suitable conditions as deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case besides the following, such as, they shall furnish undertakings at the PS concerned not to commit similar mischief and shall co-operate the I.O. in the investigation while on bail 7. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Alok