Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(Rev.Pet.No.72/2026)
2026:CGHC:13093
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 72 of 2026 {Arising out of order dated 12-9-2024 passed in WP(S)No.2255/2015}
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Respondent No.1)
2. Collector, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh (Respondent No.2)
3. S.D.O. Revenue, Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh (Respondent No.3)
4. S.D.O. Revenue, Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh (Respondent No.4)
... Petitioners versus Jailal Pradhan, S/o Tapsosini Pradhan, aged about 37 years, W/o Bharatlal Pradhan, R/o Village Potra, Post, Tahsil and Thana Lailunga, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh (Petitioner)
... Respondent Single Bench: - Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order (In Chamber) 18/03/2026
1. The above-stated review petition is taken-up for consideration in Chamber in view of Rule 90(2) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007 (for short, ‘the Rules of 2007’).
2. I have gone through the review petition and the annexed documents. SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2026.03.19 17:34:53 +0530
(Rev.Pet.No.72/2026)
3. After going through the record of the review petition and the documents annexed therewith and also the order under review, I do not find any error apparent on the face of record warranting review of the order dated 12-9-2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.2255/2015. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed in limine in terms of Rule 90(2) of the Rules of 2007 finding no sufficient cause for review of the order under review. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma