APHC010420642013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 28026/2013 Between: 1. R.MADHAVA NAIDU,, S/O.CHENGAMA NAIDU, AGED 53 YRS, OCC; FIELDMAN/I/C.AGRICULTURE OFFICER, SRI VENKATESWARA COOP SUGAR FACTORY, GAJULAMANDYAM, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST., R/O. 1-82, SHANTHI NAGAR, SBI COLONY, K.N.ROAD, PUTTUR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI VENKATESWARA COOP SUGAR FACTORY, GAJULAMANDYAM, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE CHIEF AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, SRI VENKATESWARA COOP SUGAR FACTORY, GAJULAMANDYAM, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not allotting the duties of incharge Agricultural Officer in K.Nagaram Division to the petitioner herein though Proceeding in Rc.No.B/20/2012 dated 24-8-2012 issued and the action of the 1st respondent in not allotting duties of Agricultural Officer to the petitioner is arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of article 14 & 2 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein to allot duties of Agricultural Officer to the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 34804 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to allot duties of incharge Agricultural Officer to the petitioner in pursuance of the proceedings in Rc.No.B/20/2012 dated 24-8- 2012 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M V PRATAP REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T BALAJI 2. The Court made the following: 3 Order:- This writ petition was filed challenging the action of the 1st respondent in not allotting the duties of In-charge Agricultural Officer in K. Nagaram Division to the petitioner herein though proceeding in Rc.No.B/20/2012 dated 24-8-2012 issued and the action of the 1st respondent in not allotting duties of Agricultural Officer to the petitioner. 2. This Court granted interim direction on 01.10.2013, whereby the respondents to allot duties of In-charge Agriculture Officer to the petitioner, so long as the order in Rc.No.B/20/2012 dated 24-8-2012 passed by the Managing Director is in force. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been adequately addressed by the respondents in pursuance of the interim direction passed by this Court. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 03.02.2026 PNS 4