Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23339 (CHH)

RAKESH SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/6870/2021 · 2026-06-24

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26024 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6870 of 2021 Rakesh Sahu S/o Sakharam Sahu Aged About 53 Years Head Constable No. 203, Police Station Khurud District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Inspector General Of Police Raipur Range, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Superintendent Of Police Dhamtari District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 6945 of 2021 1 - Yashwant Sinha S/o Sukalu Ram Aged About 58 Years Head Constable No. 120 Reserve Police Line Dhamtari , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner Versus Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE 2 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya , Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar , Nava Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Of Police Police Headquarter , Atal Nagar , Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Inspector General Of Police Raipur Range , Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Superintendent Of Police Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 6928 of 2021 1 - Kamal Narayan Sahu S/o Late Nathuram Sahu Aged About 61 Years Head Constable No. 123, Police Station Bhakhara , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home , Mantralaya , Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director General Of Police Police Headquarter, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Inspector General Of Police Raipur Range, Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Superintendent Of Police Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 6923 of 2021 1 - Jamvant Deshmukh S/o P.R. Deshmukh Aged About 52 Years Head Constable No. 185, Police Station City Kotwali, Dhamtri, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner Versus 3 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Of Police Police Headquarter, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Inspector General Of Police Raipur Range, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Superintendent Of Police Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 6886 of 2021 1 - Nathuram Suryakar S/o Gopal Singh Suryakar Aged About 54 Years Head Constable No. 197, Police Station Bhakhara, District Dhamtari (C.G.) ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director General Of Police Headquarter, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3 - Inspector General Of Police Raipur Range, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Superintendent Of Police Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T. K. Jha, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Parth Jha, Advocate For State : Mr. Kawaljeet Singh Saini, Deputy Government Advocate 4 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 25/06/2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) would fairly submit that by efflux of time, the instant writ petitions have become infructuous. 2. Not opposed by the other side. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner(s), the instant writ petitions are hereby dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Nadim