IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39504 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== SUBODH KUMAR GAMI Son of Ramshreshth Gami Resident of Village - Matiar Kalan, Ward No. - 08, Police Station- Sahiyara, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 07-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioner seeking bail in connection with Sitamarhi Cyber P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 111(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Sections 66, 66(C) and 66(D) of the IT Act. 3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected on 03.12.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 83212 of 2025 which reads as follows:- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Sitamarhi Cyber P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 111(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39504 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026 2/2 Sanhita, 2023 and under Sections 66, 66(C) and 66(D) of the IT Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are accused of cyber fraud. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence. Petitioners are in custody since 16.04.2025. He further submits that there is no complaint and the petitioner has been arrested from a coaching center. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner is involved in the cyber fraud/crime, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands rejected. 4. Considering the nature and gravity of the offeence as well as the fact that the petitioner is involved in cyber fraud, this Court finds no ground to review its earlier order. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands dismissed. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T