Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2333 (JHR)

RITESH v. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL FINANCE MANAGER

WPC/400/2026 · 2026-01-28

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:2112 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 400 of 2026 ------ Ritesh, aged about 28 years, R/o Late Binod Kumar Gupta, Resident of Aastha Kalyani Tower, Flat No.-G/D, Beside City Center, Sahjanand Nagar, PO & PS-Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The Union of India through the Senior Divisional Finance Manager, East Central Railway, Dhanbad, PO & PS-Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad. 2. The Senior Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Dhanbad, PO & PS-Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad. 3. The Chief Medical Superintendent, East Central Railway, Dhanbad, PO & PS-Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sriwastava, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Tripathi, CGC ------ 02/ 28th January, 2026 1. Heard the parties. 2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that in the year 2016 after death of the father of the petitioner an amount of Rs.1,19, 152/- which pertains to the year 2010-2011 has been retained by the respondents on the ground that the stock-sheet has not been closed. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India submits that if the petitioner files a detailed representation before the Senior Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Dhanbad -respondent No.2, the case of the petitioner will be considered and an appropriate order will be passed. 4. Considering the submission of the parties, I direct the petitioner to file a detailed representation ventilating his grievance before the Senior Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Dhanbad -respondent No.2 who will consider the case of the petitioner and will pass a reasoned order and if the petitioner is entitled for refund of the aforesaid amount, the same should be refunded along with the interest @ 7% per annum. 2026:JHHC:2112 2 5. If any part of the claim of the petitioner is rejected, the reasons thereof should be communicated to the petitioner. 6. The entire process should be concluded within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with the representation of the petitioner. 7. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Pending IAs, if any, also stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 28.01.2026 S.K.D.Cp-2 Uploaded on 29.01.2026