Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23329 (AP)

N.Rajesh v. N. Srinivas Murthy

CRP/2235/2024 · 2026-02-02

Ravi Cheemalapati

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010423622024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2235/2024 Between: 1. N.RAJESH,, S/O LATE N. GOPALAKRISHNAMURTHY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. 51-1005, SEETHARAMA NAGAR, KURNOOL ...PETITIONER AND 1. N SRINIVAS MURTHY, S/O. NARAYANA BHUTT AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO. 211, SURYA TOWERS, CHALLA COMPOUND, KURNOOL. 2. N SREEPATHI RAO, S/O. NARAYANA BHUTT, AGED 73 YEARS, R/O. PLOT NO. 21, SBI COLONY, NEARNETHAJI THEATRE, KURNOOL. 3. N DEVI PRASAD RAO, S/O. NARAYANA BHUTT, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O. H. NO. 50/760-A-123, GAYATRI ESTATE, KURNOOL. 4. N PRAKASH RAO, S/O. NARAYANA BHUTT, AGED 69 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 93, III RD MAIN, III CROSS, MPM LAYOUT, MALLAKADLI, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA 5. N GURURAJA RAO, S/O. NARAYANA BHUTT, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O. H. NO. 45-24K-17-1A, SRIKRISHNA COLONY, ASHOK NAGAR, KURNOOL 6. N GEETHA, V//O. LATE N. GOPALA KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED 76 YEARS, R/O. 40-796, NEHRU NAGAR, KURNOOL (L.R. OF 2 N.GOPALA KRISHNA MURTHY) (DIED) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to allow the Revision Petition, set aside the Order in I.A.No.181 of 2019 in O.S.No.48 of 2008 dated 03.09.2024, passed by the Learned Family cum IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Kurnool, allow I.A.No.181 of 2019 in O.S.No.48 of 2008 dated 03.09.2024, passed by the Learned Family cum IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Kurnool, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.48 of 2008 on the file of Learned Family cum IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Kurnool and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BUGULU SREETEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KANAKALA DEVI PRASANNAKUMAR 2. The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioner/plaintiff No.2 aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.181 of 2019 in O.S.No.48 of 2008 by the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kurnool. 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. Registry has placed on record the case information status, which indicates that on 09.09.2025, the suit was dismissed. 4. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 03rd February, 2026 JLV 4 292 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2235/2024 Date: 03rd February, 2026 JLV