NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/16734/2026 · 2026-06-18
K S Hemalekha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23326 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23326 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29877-DB WP No. 16734 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 16734 OF 2026 (GM-MM-S) BETWEEN:
1.
NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MIDFORD HOUSE, MIDFORD GARDENS OFF: MG ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
2.
NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MIDFORD HOUSE, MIDFORD GARDENS OFF: MG ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. SRINATH MANGALORE …PETITIONERS (BY SRI DHYAN CHINNAPPA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI SUNDARA RAMAN M.V., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by VEERENDRA KUMAR K M Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29877-DB WP No. 16734 of 2026
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY 13TH FLOOR, V.V. TOWER DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE NAGAR DISTRICT BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY SENIOR GEOLOGIST
2.
JOINT DIRECTOR (CONTROLLING AUTHORITY) DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY BLOCK K, JAYANAGAR KUVEMPU NAGARA SOUTH DIVISION MYSORE - 570 023 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, DIRECTING THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE FILE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT, INCLUDING THE DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE IN ITS CUSTODY FOR HAVING PASSED THE DEMAND ORDER DATED 03/03/2020 AND TO CONSIDER/HEAR REV.NO.07/2020-2021 ONLY AFTER PRODUCTION OF THE DOCUMENTS, PENDING ON THE FILE OF 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-A & ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29877-DB WP No. 16734 of 2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The petitioners have filed a revision petition being Revision Petition No.7/2020-2021, impugning the Demand Order dated
03.03.2020. The said revision petition is pending before the Revisional Authority.
2. The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to second respondent to call for the entire file of the first respondent including all the documents that are in its custody forming basis for issuance of the Demand
Order dated 03.03.2020. The petitioners also pray that a direction be issued to conduct further hearings only after the documents, which are sought, are produced.
3. The present petition is premised on the basis that the revisional authority may conclude the revision without following the principles of natural justice.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29877-DB WP No. 16734 of 2026
4. The learned Additional Government Advocate on instructions submits that the petitioners have taken twenty-two (22) adjournments before the revisional authority and should be saddled with heavy cost. Further the petitioners have also been provided with certain documents. However, the petitioners submits that those documents are not the documents they had sought.
5. The petitioners' application before the revisional authority is pending, and the revisional authorities will consider the same in accordance with law.
6. In the event the petitioners are aggrieved by the final order passed by the revisional authority, the petitioners are not precluded from availing the remedies in accordance with law. We do not consider it apposite to entertain the petition regarding any procedural issues at this stage.
7. The practice of filing such writ petitions, which would effectively interdict the progress of main proceedings, must be discouraged.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29877-DB WP No. 16734 of 2026
8. In view of the above, we decline to entertain the present writ petition. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed with cost quantified at Rs.5,000/- (Five Thousand only) which shall be deposited before the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, Bengaluru (KSLSA) within a period of two weeks from date.
Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE
KMV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12