- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30771 CRL.P No. 6700 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6700 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PUSHPA W/O SIDDGANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 2. SHRI. SIDDAGANGAIAH S/O SHANAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS BOTH ARE R/A NO.17, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 80 FEET ROAD, SUVARNA JYOTHI LAYOUT, JNANABHARATHI POST, NAGADEVANAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 056. 3. SMT. SIDDAGANGAMMA W/O LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/A NO.8,VINAYAKA LAYOUT, NAGADEVANAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 056. 4. SMT. MANJULA W/O SHRI VARADAPPA.G AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 5. SHRI. VARADARAJU S/O LATE GANGARANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS PETITIONER NOS.4 & 5 ARE R/A NO.588, KENGUTTE, JANATHA COLONY, MALLATHAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 056. Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30771 CRL.P No. 6700 of 2019 AND ALSO R/A NO.49, 9TH CROSS, LAKSHMAN NAGAR, HEGGANAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 091. …PETITIONERS [BY SRI CHETAN DESAI, ADVOCATE (AB)] AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAMANAGARA RURAL POLICE STATION RAMANAGARA. REP BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SMT. SUSHMITHA H.S. W/O SHASHIDHARA B.S., D/O SHIVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/A HUNASANAHALLI GRAMA, KAILANCHA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 562 111. …RESPONDENTS [BY SMT. SOUMYA R., HCGP FOR R1; SRI M.G.RAVISHA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 (AB)] THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASHING THE FIR IN CRIME NO.126/2019 AND SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO THE FIR AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.498-A,504,506 R/W SEC.149 OF IPC AND SEC.3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE 1st ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (Jr.Dn.) AND JMFC AT RAMANAGARA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING ON I.A., THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30771 CRL.P No. 6700 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Though matter was passed over and called again, there is no representation on behalf of petitioners. 2. Even on previous occasion, there was absence and matter was adjourned with a caution that, in case of continued absence, appropriate orders would be passed. Absence after said caution, would indicate that petitioners are not diligent in pursuing petition. Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13