( 2026:JHHC:24509 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7638 of 2026 ------ Abhishek Yadav @ Abhishek Kumar, aged about 21 years, Son of Dinesh Prasad Yadav, resident of Village Bompass Town, Near S.K.P. School, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar Town, District Deoghar. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Rishab Anand, Advocate : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 14-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kunda P.S. Case No. 68 of 2026 instituted under Section 111(2) (b), 109(1), 61 (2) of the B.N.S. Act and under section 27 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons was engaged in illegal business of grabbing land and threatening land owners on the point of fire arm on the direction of co- accused Laffu Das and during the quarrel between two co-accused persons relating to payment of money and the firing was made by the co- accused which hit the petitioner causing fire arm injury in his stomach. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is the victim of the offence. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.10 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.06.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no.12 of the bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case. It is next submitted that the co-accused with similar allegations has already been admitted on bail by this court vide order dated 03.08.2026 in B.A. No. 7162 of 2026 hence, the petitioner be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in connection with Kunda P.S. Case No. 68 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 14/08/2026 Abhiraj/