Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23310 (AP)

J.JAYARAJU, W.G.DIST v. PRL SECY, MUN ADMN & UD, HYD & 3 OTHERS

WP/12967/2014 · 2026-03-30

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010418972014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 12967/2014 Between: 1. J.JAYARAJU, W.G.DIST, HINDU, PHILIHOUSEPET, EASTERN STREET ELURU 534001 WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD. 3. ELURU MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. P PRASANNA KUMARI W/O RAMBABU, D.NO.25-8-13/A, OLD LIBRARY STREET NARASIMHA RAO PET, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SYAMSUNDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A SREEDHAR 2. B V RAM NARESH KUMAR 3. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV 2 The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: When this Writ Petition was listed on 18.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner. 2. Having noted the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:31.03.2026 Vns