Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23308 (PNJ)

SARJEEVAN SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/30338/2026 · 2026-05-26

Rupinderjit Chahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-30338-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 118 CRM-M-30338-2026 Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 Sarjeevan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Rajeev Dev Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and take action on his representation dated 18.05.2026 (Annexure P-4). 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has made a representation dated 18.05.2026 (Annexure P-4) raising his grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take necessary action thereon, qua threat DINESH BANSAL 2026.05.27 20:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-30338-2026 -2- perception. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Jasjit Singh Rattu, DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot to decide the aforesaid representation dated 18.05.2026 (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner qua threat perception only within a period of one month from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 26.05.2026 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2026.05.27 20:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh