Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 ( 2026:HHC:39411 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 1221 of 2026
Decided on: 16.09.2026 ________________________________________________ Mahavir Singh ....Petitioner Versus
Abhishek Jain & Ors. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bhupinder Thakur and Mr. Prashant Manhans, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 15.09.2026, wherein, it has been stated that representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondents/department vide order dated 15.09.2026.
2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is closed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 ( 2026:HHC:39411 )
3. However, liberty is reserved to be petitioner to avail appropriate remedy, as available to him, under the law, if he is still aggrieved. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
16th September, 2026 Judge (raman)