Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23288 (KAR)

SRI HUSSAIN MUEEN FAROOQ, v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

WP/18409/2026 · 2026-06-18

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30149 WP No. 18409 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 18409 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SRI HUSSAIN MUEEN FAROOQ, S/O LATE K.M.HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, ADVOCATE BY PROFESSION, MEMBER OF SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, NEW DELHI, MEMBERSHIP NO. F-00042/RES, RESIDING AT NO.27, 3BPH, 4TH FLOOR, SUMIT APARTMENTS, SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A IMRAN., ADVOCATE) AND: THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE EDF-1, CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH, GREATER CHENNAI POLICE, VEPERY, CHENNAI - 600007. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT CERTIORARI QUASHING THE NOTICE DATED 05.06.2026 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT UNDER SECTIONS 179 AND 94 BNSS 2023 TO THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE A AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30149 WP No. 18409 of 2026 ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; a) Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the notice dated 05.06.2026 issued by Respondent under Sections 179 and 94 BNSS 2023 to the petitioner vide Annexure-A; b) Grant such other relief’s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the circumstances of the case. 2. What has been challenged is a police notice issued under Section 179 and 94 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS, 2023) by the Tamil Nadu Police Department. The respondent in the present matter is the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Chennai. 3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner residing in the jurisdiction of this Court, the Tamil Nadu Police Department could not have issued a notice to the petitioner within the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 179 of BNSS, 2023. Even if that were to be true, it is for the petitioner to agitate the same before the jurisdictional Court having jurisdiction over the Tamil Nadu Police Department, and in this - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30149 WP No. 18409 of 2026 case the Assistant Commissioner of Police, EDF-1, Central Crime Branch, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery Chennai. This Court not having jurisdiction over the said Assistant Commissioner of Police, Chennai, the very same submission made by the counsel for the petitioner in respect of Section 179 and 94 of BNSS, 2023 would apply to this Court. Hence, this Court cannot exercise any territorial jurisdiction over the matter. 4. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional High Court, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PRS List No.: 3 Sl No.: 3