Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23281 (KAR)

SMT. DIVYA N v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/15337/2026 · 2026-06-18

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30165 WP No. 15337 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 15337 OF 2026 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN: SMT. DIVYA N AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS PROPRIETOR OF M/S UNIVERSAL TECHNOLOGIES HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT, NO.48, 3RD CROSS, ASHWATHNAGAR, RMV 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE 560 094 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AJAY J NANDALIKE.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DIRECTORATE OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, 2ND FLOOR, KHANIJA BHAVAN (SOUTH WING), RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU -560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. KARNATAKA UDYOG MITRA 3RD FLOOR, KHANIJA BHAVAN (EAST WING), NO.49, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 3. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB) NO. 14/3, II FLOOR, R.P. BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30165 WP No. 15337 of 2026 AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH., AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. B.B. PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH A LETTER DATED 13.03.2026 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE D AND ISSUE THE ALLOTMENT LETTER FOR THE PLOT NO. 113P MEASURING 2 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN HI-TECH DEFENCE AND AEROSPACE PARK, PHASE-I, KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGALURU IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER UNDER THE WOMEN ENTREPRENEUR CATEGORY AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; a) Direct the Respondent No.3 to consider the representation by the Petitioner through a letter dated 13.03.2026 produced as Annexure D and issue the Allotment letter for the Plot No.113P measuring 2 acres of land located in Hi-Tech Defence & Aerospace Park, Phase-I, KIADB Industrial Area, Bengaluru in favour of the Petitioner under the women entrepreneur category; b) Grant a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No.3 to follow all such steps required - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30165 WP No. 15337 of 2026 for allotment of land as per the government notification bearing no. CI 179 IAP(e) 2020 dated 29.01.2021 produced as Annexure F such as issuance of the confirmatory letter, possession certificate and execution of the lease-cum-sale agreement; c) Issue any other order or deems fit to the facts and circumstances of the case and to meet the interest of justice. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation of the petitioner dated 13.03.2026 at Annexure-D has not been considered and necessary orders passed thereon and no allotment has been made in favour of the petitioner. Allotment of a plot in a KIADB industrial area is required to be made in seniority and on compliance by the applicant of the required formalities. A mandamus directing the issuance of allotment letter is not maintainable. 3. Hence, the respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.03.2026 and the application submitted by the petitioner for allotment as per the applicable norms within a period of four weeks from today. 4. It is made clear that pending consideration of the said representation the respondents ought not to allot the plot to any person or entity who is junior in - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30165 WP No. 15337 of 2026 terms of filing of the application for such allotment in this particular industrial area. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 79