CENTRE FOR TRAINING EMPLOYMENT OF PUNJAB YOUTH v. THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY CUM LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS
CWP/17060/2026 · 2026-05-26
Kuldeep Tiwari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23278 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23278 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-17060 CWP-17061
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(131 + 132)
1. CWP-17060 Centre for Training and Employment of
The Appellate Authority Commissioner
2. CWP-17061 Centre for Training and Employment of Punjab Youth
The Appellate Authority Commissioner and others
CORAM: Present:
KULDEEP TIWARI
1.
caused appearance through virtual platform, apprises this Court that the prayer made in the instant writ petition(s), have been rendered infructuous, as the asked for relief has already been granted by learned Appellate Authority concerned, and therefore, he does not wish to press the instant writ petition(s).
17060-2026 and 17061-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH )
17060-2026 Centre for Training and Employment of Punjab Youth
Versus The Appellate Authority-cum-Labour Commissioner and others
17061-2026 Centre for Training and Employment of Punjab Youth
Versus The Appellate Authority-cum-Labour Commissioner and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Tahaf Bains, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in both the cases (through video conferencing). **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner(s), who has caused appearance through virtual platform, apprises this Court that the prayer made in the instant writ petition(s), have been rendered infructuous, as the ked for relief has already been granted by learned Appellate Authority , and therefore, he does not wish to press the instant writ petition(s).
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision : 26.05.2026 Punjab Youth …Petitioner
Versus
...Respondents Centre for Training and Employment of Punjab Youth …Petitioner
Versus
...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI for the petitioner(s) in both the cases ). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner(s), who has caused appearance through virtual platform, apprises this Court that the prayer made in the instant writ petition(s), have been rendered infructuous, as the ked for relief has already been granted by learned Appellate Authority , and therefore, he does not wish to press the instant writ petition(s).
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner(s), who has caused appearance through virtual platform, apprises this Court that the prayer made in the instant writ petition(s), have been rendered infructuous, as the ked for relief has already been granted by learned Appellate Authority , and therefore, he does not wish to press the instant writ petition(s).
MANPREET SINGH 2026.05.26 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-17060 CWP-17061
2.
withdrawn being not pressed
3.
numbered above.
May 26, 2026 Manpreet
17060-2026 and 17061-2026 In view of the above, the instant writ petition(s) withdrawn being not pressed. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file, as numbered above.
, 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
2 In view of the above, the instant writ petition(s) are dismissed as Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file, as (KULDEEP TIWARI)
JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No
dismissed as Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file, as MANPREET SINGH 2026.05.26 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment