Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23278 (PNJ)

CENTRE FOR TRAINING EMPLOYMENT OF PUNJAB YOUTH v. THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY CUM LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

CWP/17060/2026 · 2026-05-26

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-17060 CWP-17061 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (131 + 132) 1. CWP-17060 Centre for Training and Employment of The Appellate Authority Commissioner 2. CWP-17061 Centre for Training and Employment of Punjab Youth The Appellate Authority Commissioner and others CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. caused appearance through virtual platform, apprises this Court that the prayer made in the instant writ petition(s), have been rendered infructuous, as the asked for relief has already been granted by learned Appellate Authority concerned, and therefore, he does not wish to press the instant writ petition(s). 17060-2026 and 17061-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ) 17060-2026 Centre for Training and Employment of Punjab Youth Versus The Appellate Authority-cum-Labour Commissioner and others 17061-2026 Centre for Training and Employment of Punjab Youth Versus The Appellate Authority-cum-Labour Commissioner and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Tahaf Bains, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in both the cases (through video conferencing). **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner(s), who has caused appearance through virtual platform, apprises this Court that the prayer made in the instant writ petition(s), have been rendered infructuous, as the ked for relief has already been granted by learned Appellate Authority , and therefore, he does not wish to press the instant writ petition(s). 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 26.05.2026 Punjab Youth …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents Centre for Training and Employment of Punjab Youth …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI for the petitioner(s) in both the cases ). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner(s), who has caused appearance through virtual platform, apprises this Court that the prayer made in the instant writ petition(s), have been rendered infructuous, as the ked for relief has already been granted by learned Appellate Authority , and therefore, he does not wish to press the instant writ petition(s). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner(s), who has caused appearance through virtual platform, apprises this Court that the prayer made in the instant writ petition(s), have been rendered infructuous, as the ked for relief has already been granted by learned Appellate Authority , and therefore, he does not wish to press the instant writ petition(s). MANPREET SINGH 2026.05.26 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-17060 CWP-17061 2. withdrawn being not pressed 3. numbered above. May 26, 2026 Manpreet 17060-2026 and 17061-2026 In view of the above, the instant writ petition(s) withdrawn being not pressed. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file, as numbered above. , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 In view of the above, the instant writ petition(s) are dismissed as Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file, as (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No dismissed as Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file, as MANPREET SINGH 2026.05.26 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment