Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23259 (AP)

Gali Giridhar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/25367/2021 · 2026-03-31

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010414012021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 25367/2021 Between: 1. GALI GIRIDHAR,, S/O PRABHAKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O 7-144/1, MODUKURU VILLAGE, T-SUNDURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADEPALLI PS, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in illegally taking possession of my vehicle bearing No AP 31 BD 2116, by model Tata Safari LX, arctic white colour as illegal arbitrary and sheer abuse of power besides being violative of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and principles of natural Justice, consequently direct the 2nd respondent to handover the possession of the vehicle and to pay compensation for the wear and tear and loss caused due to the high handed action of the 2nd respondent and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KISHORE PARA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25367 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to declare the action of respondents in illegally taking possession of petitioner’s car bearing No.AP 31 BD 2116, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct 2nd respondent to handover the possession of car and to pay compensation to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. 4. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date: 01.04.2026 sj 3 107 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.25367 of 2021 Date: 01.04.2026 sj