CHANDRA KUMAR MEHTA v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND
WPC/3887/2025 · 2026-08-12
Sri Ananda Sen
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23254 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23254 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:24144 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 3887 of 2025
Chandra Kumar Mehta, son of Late Mahadeo Mahto, resident of Village- Raghuniadih, P.O. Naitand, P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma, present Address, Domchanch, P.O. & P.S.-Domchanch, Dist.-Koderma .... Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. Secretary Department of Revenue, Registration & Land Reforms, Jagarnathpur, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Deputy Commissioner, Koderma
4. Additional Collector, Koderma
5. Circle Officer, Jainagar, Koderma, Jharkhand. 6. Naim Ansari, son of Abbas Miyan, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
7. Abbas Mian, Son of Ali Mina, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.- Koderma
8. Mustkim Ansari, son of Abbas Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
9. Masir Ansari, son of Abbas Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
10. Ibrail Ansari, son of Abbas Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
11. Samim Ansari, son of Abbas Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
12. Subhani Mian, son of Ali Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.- Koderma
13. Sikandra Ansari, son of Subhani Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.- Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
14. Jamir Ansari, son of Subhani Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
15. Kalim Ansari, son of Subhani Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
16. Muslim Mian, son of Daudi Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
17. Yusuf Ansari, son of Faudi Mia, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.- Koderma
18. Mahfooz Ansari, son Latif Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
19. Saddam Ansari, son of Latif Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
20. Kayum Ansari, son of Latif Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
21. Jumrati Ansari, son of Karim Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
22. Latif Mian, son of Jahim Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.- Koderma
23. Md. Mian, son of Jahim Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.- Koderma
24. Imaman Mian, son of Jahim Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
25. Id Mohammad, son of Lattu Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
26. Lachhu Mian, son of Lattu Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
27. Yakub Ansari, son of Id Mohammad, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
28. Manir Mian, son of Rahim Mian, R/o Raghuniyadih, P.O. & P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma
… Respondent(s)
------
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Amit Kr.
Chaturvedi, Advocate For the State:
AC to GA-III
------
05/12.08.2026 In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for direction upon the respondent No. 3 for expeditious hearing and disposal of Miscellaneous Case No. 09/2022, which is pending before the learned court of Deputy Commissioner, Koderma. It has also been prayed for direction upon respondent No. 3 for digitalization of the land record with legitimate rectification. 2. During course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner admits that Miscellaneous Case No. 9 of 2022 which was pending before the Deputy Commissioner, Koderma has already been disposed of. 3. Considering the aforesaid submission, so far as the first prayer of the petitioner is concerned, the same has become infructuous. 4. The second prayer of the petitioner is that a direction be given upon respondent No.3 to digitalize the land record with legitimate rectification. The land records which the State is maintaining in physical mode needs to be uploaded in the digital platform and it is admitted that the same is being done. 5. There is nothing in the prayer portion of the petitioner, as to which records need to be uploaded and digitalized. From paragraph-20(b)(c)(d) of the writ petition, I find that there is apprehension of the petitioner that some Khatian has been forged and manipulated, either to destroy it or to make it dis-appear from the record. 6. If that be so, the petitioner should approach the Deputy Commissioner, Koderma by filing a detailed representation giving the details of the record, which according to the petitioner have been manipulated or destroyed. On receipt of such representation along with sufficient documents and materials, the Deputy Commissioner will pass an appropriate order after making proper verification. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. Pending, interlocutory applications, if any stand disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 12th August, 2026 Anu/SKC-CP-02
Uploaded On: 14/08/2026