CRM-M-12607 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 255 Suyog Vasdev and others State of Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) under Section Station Women proceedings arising said to be arrived at between the parties. deleted from the FIR during investigation. 2. learned trial regard to compromise. 3. learned Judicial of Investigating Women West, Gurugram Magistrate Ist 12607-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Suyog Vasdev and others VERSUS Haryana and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. under Sections 323, 406, 498-A, 506 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, Police Women, West Gurugram, District Gurugram proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of said to be arrived at between the parties. Sections 323 and 506 IPC were deleted from the FIR during investigation. On 09.04.2026, this Court directed the parties to appear before learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with regard to compromise. In compliance of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurugram of Investigating officer- ASI Suman, Belt No.665/GGM, Police Station Women West, Gurugram, , was recorded on Magistrate Ist Class, Gurugram, has submitted (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-12607-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:26.05.2026 …Petitioners ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana. , Advocate for respondent No.2. quashing of FIR No.0125 dated 26.08.2024, A, 506 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, Police , West Gurugram, District Gurugram, and all subsequent therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 22.01.2026 Sections 323 and 506 IPC were , this Court directed the parties to appear before Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before Gurugram, on 18.04.2026. Statement ASI Suman, Belt No.665/GGM, Police Station on 22.04.2026. Learned Judicial has submitted his report recording (O&M) .2026 s espondents , A, 506 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, Police and all subsequent 22.01.2026 Sections 323 and 506 IPC were , this Court directed the parties to appear before Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before tement ASI Suman, Belt No.665/GGM, Police Station Judicial report recording KAPIL 2026.05.28 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-12607 satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without any influence or coercion. submitted: 4. have not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. The dispute which has its genesis in a 12607-2026 (O&M) satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without any influence or coercion. The relevant part of the report “i.) There are five accused in the present FIR. ii.) Yes, accused persons are court and have given their statement in my presence. iii.) No, additional accused has been added in the present FIR and no other person is party to the compromise. iv.) No, accused persons have not been declared as proclaimed offender or are absconding in this/any other case. v.) Yes, offence under Section 323 & 506 were deleted during investigation after the registration of the present FIR. vi.) Yes, during investigation Sanjeev and Dimple have been declared as innocent. vii.) The name of he complainant is Bhawna daughter of Mohan Lal. viii.) Yes, the complainant has appeared and gave her statement in support of the compromise. ix.) Yes, I have appeared before trial court and my statement has been recorded. x.) The trial is at the stage of prosecution evidence, pending before the Trial court. xi.) The compromise, as stated by the parties, is genuine, voluntarily made with free will of the parties. xii.) No, criminal case is pending against the accused. Learned State counsel and learned counsel for respondent No.2 not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. The dispute which has its genesis in a (O&M) 2 satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without The relevant part of the report as under has been There are five accused in the present FIR. Yes, accused persons are physically present before the court and have given their statement in my presence. No, additional accused has been added in the present FIR and no other person is party to the compromise. No, accused persons have not been declared as d offender or are absconding in this/any other Yes, offence under Section 323 & 506 were deleted during investigation after the registration of the present Yes, during investigation Sanjeev and Dimple have been The name of he complainant is Bhawna daughter of Yes, the complainant has appeared and gave her statement in support of the compromise. Yes, I have appeared before trial court and my statement trial is at the stage of prosecution evidence, pending The compromise, as stated by the parties, is genuine, voluntarily made with free will of the parties. No, criminal case is pending against the accused.” and learned counsel for respondent No.2 not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. The dispute which has its genesis in a satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without as under has been physically present before the No, additional accused has been added in the present FIR No, accused persons have not been declared as d offender or are absconding in this/any other Yes, offence under Section 323 & 506 were deleted during investigation after the registration of the present Yes, during investigation Sanjeev and Dimple have been The name of he complainant is Bhawna daughter of Yes, the complainant has appeared and gave her Yes, I have appeared before trial court and my statement trial is at the stage of prosecution evidence, pending The compromise, as stated by the parties, is genuine, and learned counsel for respondent No.2 not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. The dispute which has its genesis in a KAPIL 2026.05.28 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-12607 matrimonial discord, warrants exercis BNSS. 5. Judgment of this Court in and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 “Gian Singh petition is allowed. 6. 406, 498-A Gurugram, District Gurugram, therefrom, are quashed qua the 22.01.2026. 7. 26.05.2026 Kapil 12607-2026 (O&M) matrimonial discord, warrants exercise of powers under Section Following principles of law laid down by the Full Bench Judgment of this Court in “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 “Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others” petition is allowed. Consequently, FIR No.0125 dated 26.08.2024, under Sections A and 34 of Indian Penal Code, Women Police Station, West Gurugram, District Gurugram, and all consequen therefrom, are quashed qua the petitioners, on the basis of Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable : (O&M) 3 e of powers under Section 528 of Following principles of law laid down by the Full Bench “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Hon’ble Supreme Court in Versus State of Punjab and others” (2012) 10 SCC 303, the FIR No.0125 dated 26.08.2024, under Sections and 34 of Indian Penal Code, Women Police Station, West and all consequential proceedings arising , on the basis of compromise dated Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 528 of Following principles of law laid down by the Full Bench “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and Hon’ble Supreme Court in , the FIR No.0125 dated 26.08.2024, under Sections and 34 of Indian Penal Code, Women Police Station, West tial proceedings arising compromise dated (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) KAPIL 2026.05.28 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document