Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Bimla Devi vs. Mansa Devi & another Cr.MP(M) No. 1752 of 2026 16.09.2026 Present: Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narender Guleria, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General for respondent No.2/State. The present application has been filed for condonation of 1 year, 6 months and 2 days delay in filing the present revision. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has submitted that he has no objection in case the present application is allowed. In view of this statement, the present application is allowed and the delay in filing the revision is ordered to be condoned. The present application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision (ST) No. 8205 of 2026 The delay in filing the revision has been ordered to be condoned vide separate order passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 1752 of 2026. Petition be registered. Notice. Mr. Narender Guleria, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Mr. Ajit Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General appear and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 and 2-State, respectively.
Copy of the revision has been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has submitted that the matter has been compromised between the parties. In view of this statement, petitioner is directed to deposit 7.5% of the cheque amount before Member, Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, as per the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sanjabij Tari vs. Kishore S. Brocar and another (2025) SCC Online SC 2069 and list the matter thereafter. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 16th September, 2026
(Nikita)