Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23243 (CHH)

SAVITA BHATT v. STATE OF C.G.

MCRCA/935/2026 · 2026-06-23

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25938 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 935 of 2026 1 - Savita Bhatt W/o- Shri Goverdhan Bhatt Aged About 47 Years R/o- Gram Chuchrungpur, Simga, P.S. Simga, District- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 2 - Goverdhan Bhatt S/o- Beduram Bhatt (Not Mentioned) Aged About 50 Years (Not Mentioned) R/o- Gram Chuchrungpur, Simga, P.S. Simga, District- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Applicants versus State Of C.G. Through- P.S. Simga District- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, C.G. ... Respondent For Applicants : Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Ms. Ritika Verma, PL. Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board 24/06/2026 1. This first anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 have been filed by the applicants, who are apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No.216/2026 registered at Police Station – Simga District- Baloda GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2026.06.25 11:29:58 +0530 2 Bazar-Bhatapara, C.G. for the offence punishable under Sections 190,191(2), 191(3), 331(6), 296, 115(2), 351(3), 324(4) &109 of BNS. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicants would submit that the applicants have surrendered before the learned trial court and therefore he wants to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application. 3. The submission made by learned counsel for the applicants is not opposed by the learned State counsel. 4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicants, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge gouri