SUBBARATHNAMMA MANAM v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/6307/2021 · 2026-02-17
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23242 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23242 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010409942021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6307/2021 Between:
1.SUBBARATHNAMMA MANAM, W/O BALAIAH MANAM , AGE 50, OCC. HOUSE WIFE R/O, 27/7/715, MUNICIPAL QUARTERS, NEAR MSM HIGH SCHOOL, A.C.NAGAR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE TOWN AND DISTRICT, A.P.- 524002 2.BALAIAH MANAM, S/O MALAKONDAIAH, AGE 60, OCC. LABOUR, R/O, 27/7/715, MUNICIPAL QUARTERS, NEAR MSM HIGH SCHOOL, A.C.NAGAR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE TOWN AND DISTRICT, A.P.- 524002 3.MALYADRI MANAM, , S/O BALAIAH MANAM , AGE 31, OCC.
EMPLOYEE, R/O, 27/7/715, MUNICIPAL QUARTERS, NEAR MSM HIGH SCHOOL, A.C.NAGAR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE TOWN AND DISTRICT, A.P.- 524002 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE P.S, KOTHAPATNAM POLICE STATION, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI.
2.SUBHA RAJITHA MANAM, W/O MADHAVARAO MANAM, AGE 32 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D/O THUMUKRI VENKATA NARAYANA, THUMUKURUPALEM, KOTHAPATNAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
2 ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been laid in C.C.No.2530 of 2021 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class-cum-Special Mobile Court, Ongole. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the chargesheet, if they are so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 18.02.2026 VTS