Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23240 (AP)

Shri V. Anil Kumar v. THE STATE OF AP REB BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

CRLP/6080/2021 · 2026-02-11

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010416872021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6080/2021 Between: 1.SHRI V. ANIL KUMAR, S/O VEMULA ANKAMMARAO, AGED YEARS. D/O 1-19-139/1 SATYANAPALLI ROAD, BARAMPET, OPPOSITE RAMALAYAM TEMPLE, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR ANDHRA PRADESH 522601. 2.V.ANKAMMARAO (, (FATHER) S/O CHINNA KOTAIAH R/O. D/0.1-19- 139/1 SATYANAPALLI ROAD, BARAMPET, OPPOSITE RAMALAYAM TEMPLE, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR ANDHRA PRADESH 522601. 3.V.RAJYAM, (MOTHER) W/O VEMULA ANKAMMARAO, D/O.1-19-139/1 SATYANAPALLI ROAD, BARAMPET, OPPOSIT RAMALAYAM TEMPLE, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR ANDHRA PRADESH 522601. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF AP REB BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, THE STATE OF A.P REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. 2.TAMMISETTI VASANTHA, W/O. SRI SRINIVASA RAO, MAKKENAVARIPALEM VILLAGE, SANTHAMAGULUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.A V S LAXMI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 2 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the case has become settled before the Lok Adalath. Recording the above submission, the Criminal Petition is disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt:12.02.2026 VTS