RAMSHANKAR MALLAH @ RAMASHANKAR MALLAH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1298/2026 · 2026-03-16
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2324 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2324 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2026:JHHC:6989] -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 1298 of 2026
1. Ramshankar Mallah @ Ramashankar Mallah, aged about 53 years, son of Late Jokhu Mallah.
2. Shrawan Mallah @ Sarwan Mallah, aged about 27 years, son of Ramashankar Mallah @ Ramshankar Mallah
3. Akash Mallah, aged about 29 years, son of Late Munna Mallah
4. Vimlesh Mallah, aged about 26 years, son of Late Munna Mallah
All are resident of 4 Number Balu Bunker, P.O. and P.S.-Chirkunda, District-Dhanbad.
..... … Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
..... … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate. For the State
: Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 16.03.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State.
2.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chirkunda P.S. Case No. 346 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 326(g) and 303(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there are case and counter case between the parties and the allegations made against 50 persons including these petitioners are general and omnibus.
4.
Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations of making assault and even the
[ 2026:JHHC:6989] -2-
allegation of vandalism in the house of the informant were there.
5.
Looking into the contents of the FIR, it appears that there are general and omnibus allegations against 50 persons including these petitioners except petitioner No. 4.
6.
So far as petitioner No. 4 is concerned, there are allegations of instigating the altercation between the parties. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner No. 4 Vimlesh Mallah. As such, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
7.
So far as petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 are concerned, there are general and omnibus allegations against them as well as 50 other persons and in that view of the matter, the petitioner Nos. 1 to 3, named above, are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-16.03.2026 Amitesh/-