SAMARTH BHARAT PAWAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
BA/776/2026 · 2026-08-20
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2324 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2324 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
5-BA-776-2026 (CR).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 776 OF 2026 Samarth Bharat Pawar … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra And Ors. … Respondents —————— Mr. Kunal V. Patil i/b. Ms. Rajnandini Katkar & Ms. Durva Jadhav for the Applicant. Mr. Nitin B. Patil, A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 3-State. Officer :- PSI Mr. Santosh Yadav, Sangli City Police Station, present. —————— Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. Date : 20th August 2026.
PER COURT :
1. Heard Mr. Kunal Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. Nitin Patil, learned A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 3-State.
2. Mr. Nitin Patil, learned A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 3-State refers to the order dated 16th June 2025 passed in Criminal Bail Application No. 4198 of 2024 and submits that the Applicant was granted liberty to move the Trial Court in the event of change in circumstances. osk 1 of
2
5-BA-776-2026 (CR).docx
3. Faced with the said objection Mr. Kunal Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application before the Trial Court in the event of change in circumstances.
4. This request is not opposed by Mr. Nitin Patil, learned A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 3-State.
5. In view of the statement made by Mr. Kunal Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Bail Application.
6. The Criminal Bail Application No. 776 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn.
[ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] osk 2 of
2 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2026.08.21 18:59:05 +0530