- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30979 WP No. 32271 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.32271 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. BALAJI RAJU S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDIGN AT NO. 40 N. K PALYA I CROSS, NEXT TO ELGIN PALACE SHIVAJI ROAD, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JANARDHANA G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KANDAYA BHAVANA, 2ND FLOOR, K G ROAD, BENGALURU - 560009. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30979 WP No. 32271 of 2025 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVANA, 2ND FLOOR, K G ROAD, BENGALURU - 560009. 4. THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK K R PURAM, BENGALURU-560016. 5. SRI. RAMESH K R S/O P RAMACHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 236/10 KODATHI VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 035. 6. SRI. VENKATESH SON OF LATE PAPAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.236/10 KODATHI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BENGALURU-560035 VARTHU …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; R5 AND R6 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30979 WP No. 32271 of 2025 QUASHI THE IMPUGNED ORDER 19.08.25 IN RP/534/25 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AT ANNEXURE-Q AND ALSO THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 DATED 14.12.2022 IN CASE NO R.A (B.E) 552/2022 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-J; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 19.08.2025 (Annexure-Q) passed by respondent No.2 and the order dated 14.12.2022 passed by respondent No.3 (Annexure-J). 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and upon perusal of the material on record, it is evident that the revenue authorities have effected the mutation in terms of the registered Sale Deed dated 22.11.2022. It is also to be noted that a civil suit in O.S. No.843/2021 in respect of the subject land is pending consideration before the competent Civil Court. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30979 WP No. 32271 of 2025 4. In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in the writ petition calling for interference with the impugned orders. However, it is open to the petitioner to approach the revenue authorities for appropriate relief after the conclusion of the civil proceedings and subject to the outcome thereof. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. In view of disposal of main petition, pending application, if any, stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17