1 / 3 2026:CGHC:25509 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1875 of 2021 1 - Gurdeep Singh Arora S/o Late Sewa Singh Arora, Aged About 61 Years R/o House No. 18, Matra Chhaya- Pitra Chhaya, Behind Simran Boutique, Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Harjeet Singh (Died) Through Lrs. (As Per Honble Court Order Dated 16- 06-2025) 2.1 - Raminder Singh W/o Late Shri Harjeet Singh Aged About 38 Years R/o Pitiyajhar Road, Mahasamund, Tahsil And District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 2.2 - Devendra Singh S/o Late Shri Harjeet Singh Aged About 19 Years R/o Pitiyajhar Road, Mahasamund, Tahsil And District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 2.3 - Sukhpreet Singh S/o Late Shri Harjeet Singh Aged About 18 Years R/o Pitiyajhar Road, Mahasamund, Tahsil And District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.06.25 15:18:49 +0530 2 / 3 2 - The Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector, Mahasamund., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Sub Divisional Officer-Cum Land Acquisition Officer, Mahasamund,, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 5 - Devendra Singh Alias Satte, S/o Shri Mohan Singh, Aged About 65 Years R/o Isaipara, Jail Road, Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh), District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : None appears For Resp. No.1 to 4 : Mr. Rajkumar Sahu, Panel Lawyer For Resp. No.5 : Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 22/06/2026 1. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 would submit that grievance of the petitioner based on letter dated 05.01.2021 is with regard to disbursement of award of compensation to the petitioners for the land bearing kh. no.685, 686/56/3 and kh. no.685, 686/54/4 awarded by Land Acquisition Officer vide award dated 03.10.2017. He contended that with respect to claim of amount of compensation, petitioners have already filed application under Section 64 (1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (for short “the Act of 2013”) before the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Tribunal, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (for short “Tribunal”) and placed the copy of 3 / 3 application filed under Section 64 (1) of the Act of 2013 for perusal of the Court. 2. Upon asking with regard to status of proceeding of the year 2019, learned counsel for respondent No.5 would submit hat according to his instructions, proceedings are still pending before the Tribunal. He submits that respondent No.5 herein is also respondent in that proceeding. 3. When this case was taken up for hearing on 15.06.2026, no representation was made on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 4. In the aforementioned facts of case, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen