Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23215 (AP)

Saladi Sesha Swarima v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/25001/2021 · 2026-03-22

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010408032021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.25001 OF 2021 Between: Saladi Sesha Swarima and another ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER: The present Writ Petition has been filed to declare the action of the respondents in interfering with the petitioners’ life and liberty under the guise of a Woman missing case filed by 4th respondent vide FIR No.375 of 2021 of Sarpavaram Police Station, East Godavari district, ignoring the solemnization of marriage between the petitioners on 13.10.2021. SRK, J WP No.25001 of 2021 2 2. This Court, on 29.10.2021, while ordering notice to respondent No.4, passed the following interim order in IA No.1 of 2021. “The 1st petitioner is the daughter of the 4th respondent. It is pleaded that the Petitioners 1 and 2 loved each other and were married and it is an inter- caste marriage. It is stated that the said marriage took place against the wish of the 4th respondent, who is the father of the 1st petitioner, and that at his instance, the respondent police officials are interfering in their marital life and interfering with their matrimonial rights. The 1st petitioner is a major as per the copy of the Secondary School Certificate produced by her. Her date of birth is shown as 07.06.1997. Therefore, obviously she is a major and she got right to marry a person of her choice. The copies of the photos, which are produced, bears ample testimony of the fact that there was a marriage between both the petitioners. Therefore, the respondent police officials are directed not to interfere in the marital life of the petitioners and also with their matrimonial rights, till the next date of hearing.” 3. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, submits that further action in Crime No.375 of 2021 under the head “Woman Missing” of Sarpavaram Police Station was stopped, as the missing woman i.e., 1st petitioner herein was traced. He further submits that the respondent police are not interfering with the matrimonial life of the petitioners. SRK, J WP No.25001 of 2021 3 4. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, no further orders are necessary to be passed in the present Writ Petition and the same is, accordingly, closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:23.03.2026 Nsr SRK, J WP No.25001 of 2021 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.25001 of 2021 Date:23.03.2026 Nsr