Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23211 (AP)

V. Sarojamma v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/25196/2021 · 2026-03-17

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010407162021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 25196 Between: 1. V. SAROJAMMA,, W/O. LATE VADDE CHINA NAGA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O H.NO.2/ 1196, MEKALA BAZAAR, YEMMIGANUR TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YEMMIGANUR POLICE STATION, YEMMIGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YEMMIGANUR POLICE STATION, YEMMIGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. VADDE PEDA NAGA RAJU, S/O. LATE VADDE TIMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O.YEMMIGANURU TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. V SAVITRAMMA, W/O.VADDE PEDA NAGA YEARS, R/O.YEMMIGANURU TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 25196 OF 2021 V. SAROJAMMA,, W/O. LATE VADDE CHINA NAGA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O H.NO.2/ 1196, MEKALA BAZAAR, YEMMIGANUR TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, , VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YEMMIGANUR POLICE STATION, YEMMIGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL HE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YEMMIGANUR POLICE STATION, YEMMIGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL VADDE PEDA NAGA RAJU, S/O. LATE VADDE TIMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O.YEMMIGANURU TOWN, KURNOOL V SAVITRAMMA, W/O.VADDE PEDA NAGA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O.YEMMIGANURU TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3327] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY V. SAROJAMMA,, W/O. LATE VADDE CHINA NAGA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O H.NO.2/ 1196, MEKALA BAZAAR, YEMMIGANUR TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, , VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YEMMIGANUR POLICE STATION, YEMMIGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL HE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YEMMIGANUR POLICE STATION, YEMMIGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL VADDE PEDA NAGA RAJU, S/O. LATE VADDE TIMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O.YEMMIGANURU TOWN, KURNOOL RAJU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O.YEMMIGANURU TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in repeatedly calling the petitioner to the Police Station and pressurizing the petitioner to withdraw the appeal A.S.No.672/2014 on the file of Hon'ble High Court at Amaravathi by settling the civil disputes with the respondents 5 and 6 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere in the Civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondents 5 and 6 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 & 4 not to call the petitioner repeatedly to the Police Station and not to pressurize the petitioner to withdraw the appeal A.S.No.672/2014 on the file of Hon'ble High Court at Amaravathi by settling the civil disputes with the respondents 5 & 6 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order : The present Writ Petition is filed questioning action of the Respondents 3 and 4 in repeatedly calling the Petitioner to the Police Station and pressurizing the Petitioner to withdraw the Appeal vide A.S.No.672/2014 pending before this Court by settling the civil disputes with the Respondents 5 and 6, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents, on instructions, would submit that upon receiving a report on 21.10.2021 from 6th respondent herein, the Respondent/ Police conducted a preliminary enquiry, which revealed that the dispute between the Petitioner and unofficial Respondents is civil in nature, and accordingly, they served a notice under Section 155(2) of Cr.P.C and advised to settle their dispute before competent Court and made an entry in the Station General Dairy on 21.10.2021 at 21.00 hrs. He further submitted that the petitioner was never called to the Police Station thereafter. 3. Recording the submissions made by learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. 4. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Date: 18.03.2026 KK