Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23206 (KAR)

K.LATHAVENI v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/5946/2022 · 2026-06-22

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30660 WP No. 5946 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5946 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: K. LATHAVENI W/O RANJITH KUMAR A, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT 'SHRAVANA' PERLA ROAD, UJIRE VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 240. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KETHAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT, MANGALORE - 575 001. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PUTTUR SUB DIVISION, PUTTUR, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 201. 3. K SAROJINI AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, W/O RAGHAVA POOJARY, R/AT 'SHRAVANA' PERLA ROAD, UJIRE VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30660 WP No. 5946 of 2022 D.K. DISTRICT - 574 240. 4. SHUBHAMANI K AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O YASHODHARA SUVARNA, KAMBALADADDA MANE, SHIRLALU VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT.- 574 214. 5. BHAVANI K AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, W/O SADASHIVA POOJARY,. S.D.M LECTURER QUARTERS, AJITH NAGAR, UJIRE, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K DISTRICT - 574 240. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS KUMAR M, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. A. KESHAV BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 22.02.2022 PASSED BY THE R1 AT ANNEXURE-A GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE ORDER 22.02.2022 PASSED BY THE R1 ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30660 WP No. 5946 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 22.06.2026 seeking withdrawal of the writ petition, which reads as under: "It is submitted that, the petitioner preferred this writ petition to issue writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 22.02.2022 in No. Paa.Po .Sam/Hi.Naa.Ka.Appeal-01/2021-22 passed by the Respondent No.1 on the complaint filed by the 3rd respondent under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. It is submitted that, K.Sarojini- Respondent No.3 (mother of the Petitioner) in the above Petition died on 11.12.2022. Respondent No.4 and 5 are the elder sister of the Petitioner and impleading applicant is father of the Petitioner. During last days of Respondent No.3, all family members have resolved the dispute and Respondent No.3 breathed her last breath in the house of Petitioner herein. Hence, petitioner seeks leave of this Hon'ble court to withdraw the Present Petition in the interest of justice." 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE SPV/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35