[2026:JHHC:24963] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6605 of 2026 ------ Subham Singh @ Shubham Singh, aged about 19 years, s/o Vishwajeet Singh, R/o- Jitpur Hospital Colony, P.O.- Jamadoba, P.S. – Jorapokhar, District – Dhanbad, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, Addl.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Kumar Nilesh, Advocate ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-19-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jorapokhar P.S. Case No. 49 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 238 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed murder of Shamim Ansari @ Guddu and caused disappearance of the evidence of his murder by throwing the dead-body for screening himself and the co-accused persons of the offence committed by them. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of Md. Albax Ansari @ Sidhu as well as his own confessional statement. It is also submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has allegedly supplied a pistol and one cartridge to the co-accused for committing the offence. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.04.2026 as mentioned in para-19 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-18 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Jorapokhar P.S. Case No. 49 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 19.08.2026 Saroj/