MANOJ KUMAR BANSAL AND ORS v. REKESH KANWAR AND ORS
CMP/22799/2026 · 2026-09-15
Sandeep Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23199 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23199 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
MANOJ KUMAR BANSAL AND ORS Versus REKESH KANWAR AND ORS
CMP-22799 of 2026 in COPC - 1431 of 2025
15.09.2026 Present: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents-State.
While placing on record communication dated nil issued under the signatures of Director School Education, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that since judgment passed in Ghanshyam’s case has been stayed, no order can be passed in terms of judgment alleged to have been violated in the instant proceedings.
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly acknowledges factum of stay of the judgment passed in Ghanshyam’s case and accordingly, she seeks permission to withdraw the present application with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage. Ordered accordingly.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge
September 15, 2026
(Sunil)