CRWP-6195-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (111) VIJAY SINGH RATHORE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Suman Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana MANISHA BATRA, J. ( 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondent and his family from the hand the petitioner be protected from them and to direct the respondents No.1 to 3 to decide the representation dated 19.05.2026 submitted by him. 2. At the very outset, lea submitted that the petitioner 19.05.2026 (Annexure P Police, Gurugram petition but the same has not yet been considered and no 2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of decision : 26.05.2026 VIJAY SINGH RATHORE Versus OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Suman Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family from the hands of respondents No.4 to 7 and the property of the petitioner be protected from them and to direct the respondents No.1 to 3 to decide the representation dated 19.05.2026 submitted by him. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner mitted that the petitioner has recently filed a representation on (Annexure P-1) before respondent No. 2 Police, Gurugram raising his grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRWP-6195-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 26.05.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Suman Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner s of respondents No.4 to 7 and the property of the petitioner be protected from them and to direct the respondents No.1 to 3 to decide the representation dated 19.05.2026 submitted by him. rned counsel for the petitioner has recently filed a representation on ) before respondent No. 2-Commissioner of grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.26 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-6195-2026 taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2 Commissioner of Police, filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. behalf of the respondents due course. Let a complete s the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to r aforesaid representation dated within a period of one month from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law and take necessary action, if so required. 26.05.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2 Commissioner of Police, Gurugram to decide the aforesaid repres filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paper-book be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 19.05.2026 (Annexure P within a period of one month from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law and take necessary action, if so required. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2- to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana, has advance notice on State and submits that the needful will be done in book be supplied to her during In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is espondent No. 2 to decide the (Annexure P-1) of the petitioner within a period of one month from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law and take necessary action, if so required. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.26 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.