Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23196 (KAR)

MR SYED IMTIAZ AHMED v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/1149/2022 · 2026-06-18

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29982 WP No. 1149 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 1149 OF 2022 (BDA) BETWEEN: MR SYED IMTIAZ AHMED AGED AROUND 64 YEARS S/OLT SYED MAHMOOD SABHA SHOP NO 30, BDA COMPLEX H S R LAYOUT BENGALURU - 560 102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJENDRA M A., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 5TH MAIN ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST GUTTAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 020. 2. THE REVENUE OFFICER BDA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX HSR LAYOUT BENGALURU - 560 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KARTHIKEYAN B S., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO EXTEND CONCESSION IN THE AMOUNT DEMANDED AND GRANT 6 MONTHS TIME TO CLEAR THE ARREARS OF MONTHLY LICENSE FEES, ETC., Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29982 WP No. 1149 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner though the matter is called twice in a day. Even on the last date, there was no appearance. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51