Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23196 (CHH)

KANTILAL KOSARE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8932/2022 · 2026-06-23

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25915 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8932 of 2022 • Kantilal Kosare S/o Shri S.L. Kosare, Aged About 50 Years Peon, Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon, Post, Thana And District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Urban Administration, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Commissioner Municipal Corporation Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 3. Shri Kriti Kumar Shrivastava. Assistant Revenue Inspector, Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4. Shri Awadh Ram Dahariya Assistant Revenue Inspector, Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nupur Trivedi, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State. : Mr. Shailesh Puriya, Panel Lawyer For respondent No.2 : Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate. 2 (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 24/06/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the grievance of the petitioner has already been resolved by promoting the petitioner with effect from 29-5-2023 whereas the claim of the petitioner is prior to 2014. As Departmental Promotion Committee was conduced in 2014 itself, she would further submit that the petitioner may be allowed to make a representation before the respondent authority raising his grievances with regard to consideration of the case of the petitioner for promotion from the date of departmental promotion meeting was conducted in the year 2019. 2. Prayer seems to be just and proper. 3. Accordingly, petitioner is at liberty to make a representation before the respondent No.2 within a period of 45 days from today and thereafter on such representation being filed before respondent No.2, the respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same within sixty days, in accordance with law. 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2026.06.25 14:23:36 +0530 3