Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010411942022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6222/2022 Between: 1.B.BALAJI,, S/O.B.V.BALAPA SETTY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O.19/156, GANUGA STREET, NEW PETA, KUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517 425 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT AMARAVATHI. 2.P RAJESH, S/O.RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, BANK EMPLOYEE, DRAVIDA UNIVERSITY BRANCH, GUDIPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.PRAKASH C Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
2
ORDER: No representation for the Petitioner. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been laid in C.C.No.228 of 2022 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chittoor. Considering that four years have elapsed since the filing of the chargesheet and the Petitioner has not sought amendment of the prayer, it appears that the Petitioner is either not interested in prosecuting the matter or that the parties may have arrived at a settlement before the learned Trial Court. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to challenge the chargesheet, if so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no
order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 09.02.2026 VTS