Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23190 (AP)

VELUPURU MUDDU KRISHNA REDDY v. GADI NARAYANA REDDY

CRP/2005/2025 · 2026-02-05

K Suresh Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010409842025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3239] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2005/2025 Between: 1.VELUPURU MUDDU KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. LATE RAMADASU REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. MANGA NELLORE VILLAGE AND POST, SULLURUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2.CHATTU GOPINATH REDDY,, S/O. GANGARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. MANGA NELLORE VILLAGE AND POST, SULLURUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.GADI NARAYANA REDDY, S/O. LATE SRINIVASULA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. MANGA NELLORE VILLAGE AND POST, SULLURUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2.VELUPURU GANAPATHI REDDY, S/O. LATE RAMADASU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. MANGA NELLORE VILLAGE AND POST, SULLURUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3.VELUPURU MAHESWAR REDDY, S/O. LATE RAMADASU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. MANGA NELLORE VILLAGE AND POST, SULLURUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4.CHATTU HEMASUNDARA REDDY, , S/O. GANGARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. MANGA NELLORE VILLAGE AND POST, SULLURUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT 5.SALU POLAIAH, S/O. LATE BEEMAIAH (G) NADIPAIAH, AGED 2 C.R.P.No.2005 of 2025 KSR,J ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC DAILY WAGE, R/O. MANGA NELLORE VILLAGE AND POST, SULLURUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.MUCHAKAYALA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.Y MAHA LAKSHMI 3 C.R.P.No.2005 of 2025 KSR,J The Court made the following ORDER :- Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have taken away the “no objection” from him on 02.02.2026. It is further observed that on earlier occasions also, the petitioners sought several adjournments for one reason or the other. It seems the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the present Civil Revision Petition. 2. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____ K.SURESH REDDY, J Dt. 06.02.2026 SAB 4 C.R.P.No.2005 of 2025 KSR,J 17 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2005 OF 2025 Dt. 06.02.2026 SAB