( 2026:JHHC:25170 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7055 of 2026 Tuntun Ram @ Tuntun Kumar, aged about 27 years, son of Shyamdev Ram, resident of village- Rajpur, Tola- Rajpur, P.O.- Dumari, P.S.- Jamui, Dist.- Jamui … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Nagmani Tiwari, Advocate : Mr. Govind Ray Karan, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl.P.P. --- 06/20.08.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 12.05.2026 in connection with Deori P.S. Case No.31 of 2024 for the offences registered under Sections 354, 504, 506 of the of IPC and Sections 66(C), 67(B) of the I.T. Act and Section 12 of POCSO Act, pending in the court of learned District Judge-VIII, Special POCSO Act, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 12.05.2026 and it is alleged that certain obscene photos were made viral, but no photograph or video has been recovered during investigation and chargesheet has already been submitted in this case. The learned counsel has also submitted that the victim has also refused to get her statement recorded before the court under Section 183 of B.N.S.S. and she also refused medical examination. He submits that the petitioner has been falsely implication in this case and he has no criminal antecedent. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that chargesheet has already been submitted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 2 6. Accordingly, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District Judge-VIII, Special POCSO Act, Giridih, in connection with Deori P.S. Case No.31 of 2024 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 20.08.2026 Uploaded on 21.08.2026 Jay/