AMERICAN ROAD TECHNOLOGY AND SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. M/S. EAST INDIA TRANSPORT AGENCY,
COMAP/485/2025 · 2026-06-23
K S Hemalekha
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23182 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23182 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30952-DB COMAP No. 485 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.485 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
AMERICAN ROAD TECHNOLOGY AND SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., NO.18, R.V. LAYOUT, 2ND FLOOR, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU - 560020, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SMT. BHANU PRABHA. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SWAMY M.M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S. EAST INDIA TRANSPORT AGENCY, (UNIT OF EITA INDIA LTD), NO.28, OLD NO.97, 5TH MAIN, DEVRAJUARS TRUCK TERMINAL, INDUSTRIAL SUBURB-YESWANTPUR, BENGALURU-560 022, REPRESENTED BY ITS CIRCLE MANAGER SRI. BAJRANG LAL. …RESPONDENT
THIS COMAP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1A) OF THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015 R/W SECTION 96 OF THE CPC PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.06.2025 PASSED IN COM.O.S.NO.1593/2022 MADE BY THE LXXXVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, (CCH-87), COMMERCIAL COURT, BENGALURU AND DISMISS THE SUIT BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL.
Digitally signed by C K LATHA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30952-DB COMAP No. 485 of 2025
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The present appeal has been listed erroneously, as by an
order dated 25.04.2026, this Court had granted a final opportunity to the appellant to comply with the office objections on or before 10.06.2026, failing which, the appeal would stand dismissed. The appeal was listed before the Court on the aforesaid date after the appellant had failed to comply with the office objections (8 in number) on the prior 7 occasions. Since the appellant had not complied with the office objections, by virtue of the order dated 25.04.2026, the present appeal stood dismissed. No further order warranted.
Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE CKL/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12