APHC010405502024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 20753/2024 Between: 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA, STRESSED ASSETS RECOVERY BRANCH, ADMINISTARTIVE OFFICE CAMPUS, BALAJ INAGAR, SIRIPURAM JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM. REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE(REGISTRATION) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUBREGISTRAR, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. SRI KOSANA VENKATA SAI KOTESWARA SANTOSH BABU, S/O. K NAGA BABU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO 12-10-254, RAJARAJESWARI PURAM, UMAMAHESHAWARARAO COLONY, PATTABHI PURAM, VTC GUNTUR,PO PATTABHI PURAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522006 (AUCTION PURCHASER) 5. SRI VEJJU SATYANARAYANA, S/O.SRI VENKATA NARASAYYA, DOOR, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO. 2-5, 2 MAIN ROAD, UP SCHOOL, CHANMILLI VILLAGE, NIDAMARRU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.PIN 534198 6. SMT KONISETTI VARALAKSHMI, W/O VENKATA RAMESH BABA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O DOOR NO.L 1-56, BALAYYA CHERUVU GATTU, NEAR RAMALAYAM, GANAPAVARAM MANDAL, GANAPAVARAM, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, PIN 534198. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any Appropriate Writ by declaring the inaction of the Respondent No-2 and 3, this writ petition is being filed aggrieved by the inaction of the Respondent No-2 and 3 in not considering the Representation of the Petitioner dated 30-07-2024, and in not receiving and not registering the Sale Certificate Produced by the Petitioner Bank, Dated 19-07-2024, in favour of the Fourth Respondent, on the ground that, there is an attachment order in favour of Respondent Number 6, Dated 19-01-2021, which is subsequent to the Mortgage created in favor of the Bank on 22-06-2018 is contrary to Law settled by this Honble Court in several Writ Petitions, contrary to the Memo issued by the First Respondent in Memo No. G1/E5831041/2022, Dated 13-05- 2022, contrary to the Judgment of this Honble Court in W.P.No. 18882 of 2022, contrary to Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interests Act,2002, Contrary to Articles 14, 16, 19, 21, 300-A of Constitution, and against the principals of natural justice, contrary to Law, and liable to be Set- aside, is illegal, consequently direct the Second and Third Respondents to Register the Sale Certificate Produced by the Petitioner in favor of Fourth Respondent for the property in -i.e., All that Part and Parcel of Commercial Plot bearing Survey Number 60/2, China Ramachandrapuram, Ganapavaram, admeasuring total extent of 412.54 Sq yards, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the Second and Third Respondents to Register the Sale Certificate dated 19-07-2024, Presented by the Petitioner Bank in favor of Fourth 3 Respondent, for the property in All that Part and Parcel of Commercial Plot bearing Survey Number 60/2, China Ramachandrapuram, Ganapavaram, admeasuring total extent of 412.54 Sq yards. West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VARDHINEEDI SAI KIRAN 2. N RAVI PRASAD 3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: 4 ORDER: Sri S. Satyanarayana Moorthy, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, no cause survives in this Writ Petition. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 18.02.2026 PNS