[2026:RJ-JP:15555] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4096/2023 1. Manisha Sharma Wife Of Shri Devesh Kumar Sharma, Resident Of Brahampuri Colony, Near Goshala, Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur (Raj). 2. Neeraj Upadhyaya Wife Of Shri Satis Upadhyaya, Resident Of P-33, Shyam Vihar- 4, Jairampura Road, Khorabisal, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. Guddi Devi Wife Of Shri Rakesh, Resident Of Sharda Vihar, Odela Road, Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur (Raj). ----Accused/Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Vishnu Sharma Son Of Shri Sriniwas Sharma, Aged 35 Years, Resident Of Shekhpur Brahmin, Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankur Singh Tomar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 15/04/2026 1. The instant misc. petition is listed before this Court in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Vijay Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 773/2026, decided on 15.01.2026), wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court observed that in various matters, interim orders have been passed in criminal revision petitions and petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as a result of which trial relating to serious offences such as murder, [2026:RJ-JP:15555] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4096/2023] rape, dacoity, dowry death, etc., could not proceed and remained stalled/held up due to the passage of considerable time. 2. Directions have been issued to this Court and other High Courts to take up such like matters which are pending since long, on priority and decide the same expeditiously without deferring the hearings to subsequent dates. 3. By way of filing the instant petition a challenged has been made to the impugned FIR No. 43/2023, registered with Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur for the offences punishable under Section 143, 302 & 506 IPC. 4. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the instant petition, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioners before the Trial Court and charges have been framed against them. Thereafter, the petitioners have challenged the order of framing of charge by way of filing a separate misc. petition. Hence, under the changed circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioners to continue with the instant petition, therefore, the same has become infructuous. 5. Considering the above, the instant petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, shall also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam-Puneet/20