RAHUL SINGH ALIAS BABLU ALIAS GETLU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./7820/2026 · 2026-08-20
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23176 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23176 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:25112 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 7820 of 2026
------ Rahul Singh @ Bablu @ Getlu, aged about 30 years, son of Krishna Singh, resident of House No. 13/26, Pawat Mohallah, Goushala Nala Road, Jugsalai, P.O. & P.S.-Jugsalai, Jamshedpur, Dist.-East Singhbhum
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Avnish Prakhar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 20.08.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jugsalai P.S. Case No. 39 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 332(b), 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant by firing upon him. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that no one has sustained bullet injury. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.05.2026 as has been mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide
order dated 18.08.2026 in B.A. No.7780 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in connection with Jugsalai P.S. Case No. 39 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
20.08.2026 Gunjan-